![]() It would be a poor patriot who could not remember what he or she was doing on September 11 2001. Some theorists have argued that part of the reason that our flashbulb memories are so long-lasting is because having such a vivid memory is “proof” of our membership in a particular social group. The US National Archivesįor instance, the 1977 study that coined the term “ flashbulb memories” showed that although both black and white Americans almost universally recalled flashbulb memories of John F Kennedy’s assassination, black Americans were more than twice as likely to have flashbulb memories for the assassination of Martin Luther King, Jr than were white Americans. Martin Luther King, Jr at the Civil Rights March on Washington, DC, August 28 1963. So why does learning about a big event create such vivid memories? And just how accurate are flashbulb memories? There might be an advantage to recalling the elements of important events that happen to us or to those close to us, but there appears to be little benefit to recalling our experience hearing this kind of news. In a flashbulb memory, we recall the experience of learning about an event, not the factual details of the event itself. ![]() These recollections are called flashbulb memories. Why would people who were not immediately or directly affected have such a long-lasting sense of knowing exactly where they were and what they were doing when they heard the news? ![]() ![]() It isn’t surprising that many Bostonians have vivid memories of the 2013 Marathon bombing, or that many New Yorkers have very clear memories about where they were and what they were doing on 9/11.īut many individuals who were not onsite for these attacks, or not even in Boston on Apor in New York on Septemalso have vivid memories of how they learned about these events. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |